2002 vs 2003+

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

chirokj

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Location
Atlanta, GA
What exactly are the changes to the liberty after 2002? i noticed the roll over ratings are different too?
 

tjkj2002

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2006
Messages
10,612
Reaction score
41
Location
Somewhere between being sane and insane!
What exactly are the changes to the liberty after 2002? i noticed the roll over ratings are different too?
Any KJ with a build date prior to april 12th 2002 sit 3/4" higher stock then those made after april 12th 2002(hence the different rollover ratings),they lowered the KJ due to bad press over a magizine rolling one in a test that couldn't be duplicated(just a freak accident).Also in the begining of 2003(varies alot) they started replacing the better ******,45RFE, with the 42RLE.Also only 2002(4wd models only) came standard with the front skid,was a option on '03+ models.
 

2003KJ

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2004
Messages
5,283
Reaction score
6
Location
Planet Earth
Any KJ with a build date prior to april 12th 2002 sit 3/4" higher stock then those made after april 12th 2002(hence the different rollover ratings),they lowered the KJ due to bad press over a magizine rolling one in a test that couldn't be duplicated(just a freak accident).Also in the begining of 2003(varies alot) they started replacing the better ******,45RFE, with the 42RLE.Also only 2002(4wd models only) came standard with the front skid,was a option on '03+ models.

In addition, 2002 models got rear drum brakes, and in 2003 4 wheel disc became standard.
 

Prospect62

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2007
Messages
436
Reaction score
0
Location
New Hartford, NY
2005 and up the rear turn signal lenses changed from amber to clear. The 2005 and up models use amber bulbs with the clear lenses.
 

tjkj2002

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2006
Messages
10,612
Reaction score
41
Location
Somewhere between being sane and insane!
any cons/pros between the 45 rfe and the 42 rle you guys can think of?
The 45RFE is a truck ******,has lived behind 4.7 V-8's and was the ****** used in the RAM's when the 5.7 HEMI was first brought out,the CRD's 545RFE is a version of the 45RFE,different guts to give it a second overdrive.

The 42RLE started out as the A604,the ****** made for the Doge minivans when they started coming out in the '80's,was retro fitted to use in a front engine/rear wheel drive vehicles and changed names to the 42RE then went to the 42RLE.

Chrysler uses the first numbers to show the trannies strength,the bigger the number the stronger the ******,so the 45RFE is stronger then the 42RLE.Just like the 46RE(behind the Cummins in 3/4 and 1ton trucks) is stronger then the 45RFE.Oh and the 45RFE has two second gears,one is only used for highway passing kickdown gear,so it's a 5 speed ******,the 545RFE is realy a 6 speed ******,the 42RLE is only a 4speed.The 45RFE has a 3.00:1 1st gear and reverse,the 42RLE has 2.2:1(if I rember right) or 2.84:1 1st gear and a 2.2:1 reverse gear.
 

chirokj

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Location
Atlanta, GA
why would DC then change the stronger one for a weaker one? makes no sense to me..
 

2003KJ

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2004
Messages
5,283
Reaction score
6
Location
Planet Earth
why would DC then change the stronger one for a weaker one? makes no sense to me..

The "weaker" one is probably cheaper to make, and more cost effective as they probably share it amongst a number of different vehicles, where as the "stronger" one is really only found behind the RAM's.
 

4Factor

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2004
Messages
489
Reaction score
1
Location
Canada
why would DC then change the stronger one for a weaker one? makes no sense to me..

I've got another possible reason towards the "why they changed to a weaker ******". The weaker 42RLE is likely smaller than the 45RFE. Take a good hard look at the size of the passenger footwell of the 02 and compare it to the 03's made after July 01, 2003 (when they changed to the 42RLE). Notice there's ALOT more passenger footroom in the Liberty with the 42RLE. The slightly more spacious later model goes a long way in the comfort factor when making long trips. Still the 45RFE is a stronger ******.

I don't need a ****** that's bulletproof... I don't believe I'll ever be shooting at it! :)
 

JeepJeepster

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2004
Messages
8,933
Reaction score
328
Location
Dem hollers in Ky
It's all about part availeablity and $$$$$$,the 42RLE is cheaper then the 45RFE,money is the bottome line.

Pretty much. And I would say its supply and demand. Since they use the 545rfe behind hemis and pretty much every dodge car gets the hemi they are using alot more of them now. (And I know the 45rfe is alittle different than the 545rfe, but its the same case).

Grands also use the 545rfe.

The 42rle has not been proven to be unable to handle the 3.7 in the liberty. It seems to be an ok ****** but the 45rfe was much better for offroad with its lower grearing. Engine breaking was alot better with it too.
 

sideshowant

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2007
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Location
new york
i have an 05 with the 2.4l and the 6 speed manual transmission. i think its the nsg370. if i were to swap in the 3.7l would that trany hold up or would i have to swap it out also?
 

AlexKJ

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2007
Messages
314
Reaction score
2
Location
Earthquakeland
The 42RLE started out as the A604,the ****** made for the Doge minivans when they started coming out in the '80's,was retro fitted to use in a front engine/rear wheel drive vehicles and changed names to the 42RE then went to the 42RLE.

You stroked the wrong button in your keyboard...;) The 42LE is the ancestor of the 42RLE... The 42RE and the 42RLE aren't related... (This post has a little more detail about this subject :))
 

Griemster1

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Location
Waterford, MI
So on mine the build date was april 2001 which i dont completly understand cause cause its a 2002 but anyways that means mine sits 3/4' higher already and probally has the 45rfe trans? also since it sit 3/4" higher can i do a 2" lift or would that put me in the danger zone for problems with cv shafts and such.
 

Dave

Administrator
KJ Supporting Member
KK Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
15,567
Reaction score
16
Location
on here
In this post somebody says that they actually did proved the opposite.

Alex.......yea but that's "destructive testing".....where they keep testing until it breaks so they can tell how it performs and it's max breaking point.

And anything can break. But if the ****** was not capable of performing behind the motor, (taking continuous outright abuse out of the equasion) then they would all be breaking. That is not the case.

Dave
 

Latest posts

Members online

Top