Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
javert said:
I know how to read. Your theory didn't prove to be true.javert said:glaurick said:Just to let you know penske, I just went outside and did you hose trick with every light, a/c, turning wheel and nothing wierd happened, go peddle your wares elsewhere :-({|=
Does no one listen. You have an 04. The problem is with the 05 and up (3.7L only). Does no one know how to read here?
javert said:Ok, before anyone blasts me for posting a link, I found this online and did not know how to add the pdf. This is very interesting seeing as Jeep Libertys are supposed to be "trail rated" and go through water etc. Unbelievable the belt actually stops when it gets wet. Try it for yourself.
http://www.tendeco.com/techtips.nsf...ff9477eb50c77c0b852570d00054d3dc?OpenDocument
glaurick said:I know how to read, you don't know how to present fact, all you can say is "SOMETHING Changed in 05"
javert said:glaurick said:I know how to read, you don't know how to present fact, all you can say is "SOMETHING Changed in 05"
OK you want facts:
In the ongoing quest for more torque and more Horsepower and lower emissions, I believe jeep made some internal engine changes (not sure what) as well as computer calibration to the Liberty 3.7L. These changes caused a belt system issue to the point where the vehcile was not sellable. The belt material was subsequently changed and they also found they had to add a one way clutch pulley to the alternator in order to sell the first few thousand off the line. If you want to verify my "facts" why not call up a dealership and ask for the part number of an alternator for a 2004 or 03 vs. a 2005?
Please stop attacking my character and continually calling me a salesman. Yes, I have been kicked out of another forum, simply by telling people what parts seem to work the best for their situation (they thought I was selling as well). I am only trying to help. Trust me, when it comes to belt drives, I know a thing or two. If you read some of my posts, you will see that I recommend both Goodyear parts as well as Gates parts. Are Goodyear and Gates not direct competitors?
Eddo said:javert said:glaurick said:I know how to read, you don't know how to present fact, all you can say is "SOMETHING Changed in 05"
OK you want facts:
In the ongoing quest for more torque and more Horsepower and lower emissions, I believe jeep made some internal engine changes (not sure what) as well as computer calibration to the Liberty 3.7L. These changes caused a belt system issue to the point where the vehcile was not sellable. The belt material was subsequently changed and they also found they had to add a one way clutch pulley to the alternator in order to sell the first few thousand off the line. If you want to verify my "facts" why not call up a dealership and ask for the part number of an alternator for a 2004 or 03 vs. a 2005?
Please stop attacking my character and continually calling me a salesman. Yes, I have been kicked out of another forum, simply by telling people what parts seem to work the best for their situation (they thought I was selling as well). I am only trying to help. Trust me, when it comes to belt drives, I know a thing or two. If you read some of my posts, you will see that I recommend both Goodyear parts as well as Gates parts. Are Goodyear and Gates not direct competitors?
Interesting. Both Napa and Advanced Auto both list the same 160 amp alternator for an 03 and 05. Just for the fun of it I called Jeep. Same 160 amp alternator for both. It list 02-06 for the years. However, Napa and Jeep lists a different 136 amp alternator for 05 vs 03, but advanced lists the same one.
Fact is, there are tons of people that wheel 05 and up KJs through deep water and not one has had a problem. I've personally wheeled with an 05 and 06 KJ numerous time through deep water and not one of them had a problem.
javert said:...they had to add a one way clutch pulley to the alternator in order to sell the first few thousand off the line....
javert said:Please stop attacking my character and continually calling me a salesman. Yes, I have been kicked out of another forum, simply by telling people what parts seem to work the best for their situation (they thought I was selling as well). I am only trying to help. Trust me, when it comes to belt drives, I know a thing or two. If you read some of my posts, you will see that I recommend both Goodyear parts as well as Gates parts. Are Goodyear and Gates not direct competitors?
2003KJ said:We are not attacking your character, we are merely trying to tell you that the information you have is false. The 3.7L is the same on all Liberty's...from the first one that rolled off the line for the 2002 year, to the ones rolling off the line right now. Therefore, if there was an issue on the 2005 3.7L, there would be a problem with ALL of them. Period.
javert said:Try it for yourself and you'll soon stop making statements about my so called "false information".
Cableguy said:javert said:Try it for yourself and you'll soon stop making statements about my so called "false information".
Yep. So um, go ahead and read eddo's post on the previous page. Pretty sure he did. Is it entirely possible that one of those is the 160amp and the other is the 136amp?
Arguing on the internet is stupid, but fun!
Cableguy said:Yep. So um, go ahead and read eddo's post on the previous page. Pretty sure he did. Is it entirely possible that one of those is the 160amp and the other is the 136amp?
javert said:Cableguy said:Yep. So um, go ahead and read eddo's post on the previous page. Pretty sure he did. Is it entirely possible that one of those is the 160amp and the other is the 136amp?
My point exactly ! Why would there be two different alts available for only one year Liberty 3.7L? I told you something changed. They were trying to fix the belt drive issue by alternator changing (one way clutch pulley). Thanks for finally agreeing with me.
I seem to recall someone saying that a 3.7 is a 3.7 is a 3.7 and that they are all the same ( all years as well).
Once again thanks for finally agreeing with me.
Marlon_JBT said:Uh, he didn't agree with you.
136A Alternator is standard on Sport.
160A Alternator is standard on Renegade.
The engine is still the same, that is exactly what 2003KJ was attemtping to point out.
Cableguy said:javert said:Cableguy said:Yep. So um, go ahead and read eddo's post on the previous page. Pretty sure he did. Is it entirely possible that one of those is the 160amp and the other is the 136amp?
My point exactly ! Why would there be two different alts available for only one year Liberty 3.7L? I told you something changed. They were trying to fix the belt drive issue by alternator changing (one way clutch pulley). Thanks for finally agreeing with me.
I seem to recall someone saying that a 3.7 is a 3.7 is a 3.7 and that they are all the same ( all years as well).
Once again thanks for finally agreeing with me.
Note that I didn't agree with you at all.
You should realize that the renegade uses a 160 amp alternator, and the limited/sport uses the 136 amp. Two different alternators for different trim levels. A 3.7 is a 3.7 is a 3.7, but the alternators are different for the rennegade to run the lightbar etc. The motor is no different.
javert said:I seem to recall someone saying that a 3.7 is a 3.7 is a 3.7 and that they are all the same ( all years as well).