rockymountain
Full Access Member
actually a shock in front. Taken from the FAQ:
Bilstein: F4-BE5-6458-H7
OME: NS131
Bilstein: F4-BE5-6458-H7
OME: NS131
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
One of the things is most use worn out springs so right away you're fighting a loosing battle
Springs sag, more often then you know. Coils, by design sag more often then leaf springs. If you go pick up a book wit hride height specs, and start checking, you might shock yourself at what you find. As a rule, any Ford with the I beam and coil spring setup in front, have alot of spring sag by the 80k mile mark. When they come in for an alignment, the extreme negative camber they measure out to makes it more apparent. Putting fresh coils puts the camber back in spec most of the time. Old american fullsized cars loved eating coil springs for lunch. A combination of weak or substandard shocks, and bouncy roads made short work of coils. Excessive bouncing will create heat in coil springs and weaken them, making them sag.
I'm unsure what you mean by worn out springs.I've never had a spring to sag or ride noticeable different from the way came from the factory. :happy175:I'm unsure what you mean by worn out springs.I've never had a spring to sag or ride noticeable different from the way came from the factory. This includes the rear springs on trucks I've used to haul and pull some heavy trailers.
My 2.5 lift is holding up pretty good. I've put about 15k mostly highway miles on the lift. 65k total on Jeep. I'll probably keep only another 30k depending on Obama and Congress. If they take away my 201k I'll be riding a frickin bicycle.
I'm unsure what you mean by worn out springs.I've never had a spring to sag or ride noticeable different from the way came from the factory. :happy175:
Not an insult at all
Just funny since every spring sags over time, gravity takes over
Sorry if you took it that way but facts are facts
Too bad you're not closer so you could take a ride in a well setup KJ we have several around here that would be willing to show you
\And why is it that when new KJs were 19 inches and after 40-60,000 miles most all are down to 18??
Just curious on your thoughts regarding that if its not sag what is it, magnet sucking it to the ground?
It clearly says "worn out". What is the industry standard to call springs "worn out"? Sag would lead to "worn out" eventually but if ride height is acceptable and ride is comfortable why would I consider them worn out?Redbone
I'm unsure what you mean by worn out springs. ...Originally Posted by tommudd
One of the things is most use worn out springs so right away you're fighting a loosing battle
\And why is it that when new KJs were 19 inches and after 40-60,000 miles most all are down to 18??
Just curious on your thoughts regarding that if its not sag what is it, magnet sucking it to the ground?
Drive an identical vehicle with new springs and shocks, and you may rethink your stance.
If you are referring to me probably not. You are proving my point. Tom throws "worn out" around without an actual reference to what that actually is. We, the ignorant, need to know what that refers to when deciding how to proceed. Just because a vehicle has *** miles on it doesn't mean it has "worn out" springs. All ya gotta do is take time to read my previous questions. What is "worn out" referring. I've been laughed at and told the highway has magnets BUT never been told what "worn out" is .... and I've been gracious enough to not make fun of anyone not having basic comprehension skills of the written word. I simply want an explanation so we understand each other when us, not in the profession, are discussing.
Note: in your driving seminar you only list strut and shock changes. The ride difference would be notable of course but if there was no spring changes the exercise would be moot as far as this issue is concerned.
It's a industry known fact that shocks/struts will be "worn out" at about 50,000 miles.Even the fancy Fox shocks on the new Ford Raptors require rebuilding to make it to there 1 million mile life and is part of that shocks normal maintenance as they are owner rebuildable.If you are referring to me probably not. You are proving my point. Tom throws "worn out" around without an actual reference to what that actually is. We, the ignorant, need to know what that refers to when deciding how to proceed. Just because a vehicle has *** miles on it doesn't mean it has "worn out" springs. All ya gotta do is take time to read my previous questions. What is "worn out" referring. I've been laughed at and told the highway has magnets BUT never been told what "worn out" is .... and I've been gracious enough to not make fun of anyone not having basic comprehension skills of the written word. I simply want an explanation so we understand each other when us, not in the profession, are discussing.
Note: in your driving seminar you only list strut and shock changes. The ride difference would be notable of course but if there was no spring changes the exercise would be moot as far as this issue is concerned.
Worn out in here is 18 to 18.5 inches from center of hub to bottom of flare. Just note that you are going against the grain of this entire forum. You are challenging facts that have been know for years and years. You cannot get fired up with opposition to that.
Its a good thing you'll keep riding on the same old springs. You'll never get plagued by knowing how awful or rather how much better new ones are than those cheap springs they put under it at the factory. to each his own...
You could have stopped at the first sentence. I'm not challenging facts. I simply want to know what "worn out" is. I'm not going to change springs just because someone says mine are "worn out". I'll show a small portion of my epeter just to make a point. My son and I just finished a 1006 h.p. LT1 for his '96 Camaro. My point is when it comes to all things automotive I deal with specs. My point is if members on this board want to inform others they should use specifics to impress on the minds of others just how correct their info is. I'm being neither against the grain nor argumentative. Just discussing. Bench racing if you will. Folks shouldn't get their ******* in a wad.
Its actually not moot, its a demonstration on how your vehicle's ride slowly degrades with worn parts, in that case shocks and struts. In your case it would be springs.
Since their was no test this would be a subjective thought. Informed as you appear to be a professional but not actually proven.
Take an identical vehicle with new springs, and I bet you will notice a difference. If you do some research at the motorist assurance program website, it may help define "worn out". The only thing I can tell you is, worn out means literally, out of the specification limits set by the OEM. In this case, worn out means the springs have sagged to the point that the ride height is no longer in spec. err go, worn out. Simple eh?
Simple when you directed me to specs. I haven't looked at them yet but I will. Worn out means worn out but no one knows until they have specs and info on how to use them.
Mine are flapping in the wind. Yours are all wrapped up and stuffed into something.